Popular in Social Sciences

Books

City Time: On Being Sentenced to Rikers Island

Independent Scholar David A. Campbell

Culture and Society

The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place

New York University Harvey Moltoch

Economics

Gender and Economics

University of California Santa Barbara Shelly Lundberg

American Politics

Keeping the Republic

Boston College Marc Landy

Banks and Policy Organisations

Greening the financial sector

European Investment Bank Matteo Ferrazzi

British Politics

Entrepreneurial thinking: the politics and practice of policy impact

University of Sheffield Matthew Flinders

Culture and Society

Carceral Entrapments: Views from the Prison/Street Interface in India

Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Mahuya Bandyopadhya

The Impact of Colors on Sports Performance

View more insights in Social Sciences - Psychology - Social Psychology

View more figures from University of San Diego

View the page of Nadav Goldschmied

Read the Study

Nadav Goldschmied discusses the influence of colors on sports performance, emphasizing the importance of team distinguishability for fans and referees. The discussion delves into the psychological meaning of colors, the red superiority effect, and the association of black uniforms with aggression. The visibility contrast of white uniforms in judo is also considered. Despite these theories, research findings remain inconclusive due to limitations in sample size and methodology.

Image courtesy of interviewee. June 26, 2024

Generating Workspace

Export as PDF

This video is a discussion about the influence of uniform colors in sports on performance and perception. The conversation takes place on June 14th in London, where the speakers explore whether uniform colors can affect athletic performance. They highlight the importance of distinguishable colors for teams and officials during games.

The discussion includes a theoretical framework based on research by Elliott and Maier (2014), which posits that colors carry psychological meanings and can elicit either approach or avoidance responses. These responses can have subtle effects on performance in competitive sports.

Key findings presented include:

1. **Red Superiority Effect**: Research suggests that teams wearing red uniforms tend to win more often than those in other colors. This video effect has been observed in various sports, such as combat sports during the Athens Olympics and British soccer, where red teams are more successful, particularly in home games.

2. **Black and Aggression**: Studies indicate that teams wearing black may be perceived as more aggressive. Research found that NFL and NHL teams in black faced more penalties, which might stem from cultural associations and perceptions of aggression rather than actual behaviors.

3. **White Disadvantage in Judo**: There is a suggestion that wearing white in judo may confer disadvantages due to visibility, allowing opponents to anticipate moves.

The speakers critique existing research methods and findings, stressing the need for more robust, longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes to better understand these dynamics. They emphasize that while color may influence perception and referee decisions, the actual impact on behavior or performance is not definitively proven.

In conclusion, the discussion encourages future research focusing on referee perceptions and the contexts in which color effects are manifested, recognizing the complexity of the topic and the interplay between color, perception, and performance in sports.

Language:

Export as PDF

Export as PDF
Here are some articles that discuss similar themes regarding the influence of color in sports uniforms on performance, perception, and behavior:

1. **"The Psychology of Color in Sports: How Uniforms Affect Performance"** - This article explores the psychological implications of color choices in sports uniforms and how they can impact athletes' performance and mental states during competitions. It discusses several studies that reveal insights into how color can influence not just the athletes but also referees and spectators.

2. **"Color and Competition: Does Uniform Color Affect Performance?"** - A detailed examination of the effects of uniform color on competitive sports. It reviews various empirical studies highlighting cases where teams dressed in certain colors (like red) performed better and how this can be attributed to psychological associations with colors.

3. **"Aesthetic Factors in Athletic Performance: The Role of Uniform Colors"** - This article discusses how the aesthetic aspects of sports uniforms, particularly color, play a significant role in shaping perceptions of teams and players, as well as how these perceptions can feed back into athletes' performance through confidence and aggression levels.

4. **"The Effects of Color on Sports Performance: A Review of the Literature"** - A comprehensive literature review that synthesizes findings from various studies related to color perception in sports. It highlights the red superiority effect, the implications of wearing black, and the potential disadvantages of lighter colors, especially in combat sports.

5. **"Wearing Red: Does It Give You an Edge in Sports?"** - This piece specifically zooms in on the red superiority effect, discussing various cases from the Olympics and team sports, focusing on how athletes perceive their opponents and how referees might perceive those in certain colors.

6. **"Uniform Effect: An Analysis of Team Color and Performance in Professional Sports"** - An analytical piece that evaluates how different colors affect team dynamics and performance. The article also addresses perceptions of aggression related to black uniforms and provides insight into the cultural narratives surrounding color.

These articles should provide a good foundation for exploring the nuanced relationship between uniform colors and their potential psychological impacts on performance and perception in sports convideos.

X-TIMESTAMP-MAP:LOCAL=00:00:00.000,MPEGTS=900000

00:00.115 --> 00:03.045
It's really important that the two teams

00:03.825 --> 00:07.925
are distinguishable, that, they know,

00:08.705 --> 00:13.485
folk from friend, that the, that the fans

00:14.035 --> 00:15.965
know, to distinguish the two

00:15.965 --> 00:18.485
that the referee obviously can distinguish.

00:19.305 --> 00:22.005
So it's clearly apparent, right?

00:22.065 --> 00:26.125
And it's, it's made as such. And, indeed it is.

00:26.985 --> 00:31.925
So it, stands to reason that we would also look

00:32.105 --> 00:36.205
for associations that, this so apparent,

00:37.145 --> 00:41.645
coloring schemes may influence performance.

00:42.505 --> 00:47.245
Um, but, my research

00:48.065 --> 00:50.925
is informing, informing me actually otherwise.

00:51.025 --> 00:54.285
But we can start from the, assumption

00:54.435 --> 00:55.765
that there is an effect

00:56.305 --> 01:00.045
and then work our way to, possibly,

01:00.045 --> 01:02.005
whether is not one,

01:02.105 --> 01:05.125
and I think it would be worthwhile grounding

01:05.785 --> 01:08.765
the discussion in the theory of, Elliot

01:08.945 --> 01:12.045
and Mayor from 2014 of,

01:12.305 --> 01:13.965
coloring context.

01:14.745 --> 01:16.925
So it's, it's a broader theory.

01:16.995 --> 01:19.765
It's not, it's, it does not only pertain to sport,

01:19.825 --> 01:21.525
but it's a, it's a good starting point.

01:22.465 --> 01:26.005
And, it argues several things, for example,

01:27.585 --> 01:31.915
that, colors have, psychological meaning

01:32.215 --> 01:34.995
beyond, physiological properties.

01:35.735 --> 01:40.635
Um, so they carry relevant, meanings to human beings

01:40.895 --> 01:41.995
and otherwise as well.

01:42.695 --> 01:47.195
Um, that, they elicit,

01:49.115 --> 01:53.715
a response that at the core is either approach

01:54.415 --> 01:56.715
or avoidance oriented.

01:57.535 --> 02:02.155
Um, and this is really, really important in sports where,

02:02.535 --> 02:07.075
if you gain, minimal advantage initially,

02:07.295 --> 02:11.435
it may make big, difference in the outcome,

02:11.775 --> 02:12.995
of the competition.

02:14.015 --> 02:18.955
Uh, it argues, for example, that those, the,

02:19.215 --> 02:23.315
the way that certain colors gain meaning

02:24.055 --> 02:26.915
is through two, two distinct mechanisms.

02:27.895 --> 02:30.315
One is of conditioning.

02:31.095 --> 02:35.995
So repeated associations of past,

02:36.225 --> 02:38.235
give meaning to future,

02:39.335 --> 02:41.985
encounters.

02:42.085 --> 02:46.065
So I, an example for that would be, so red is,

02:46.725 --> 02:50.145
is discussed often in sports, for example, or,

02:50.285 --> 02:51.305
or otherwise attraction.

02:52.405 --> 02:54.705
Um, so,

02:55.085 --> 02:59.445
and in research in sport, we some argue for the, red,

02:59.705 --> 03:01.005
superiority effect.

03:01.025 --> 03:04.285
The teams in red, tend to win more than others.

03:05.385 --> 03:09.985
Um, possibly this has been gained

03:09.985 --> 03:14.065
through the association in red of red and apprehension

03:14.765 --> 03:16.865
or, being stalled.

03:16.925 --> 03:19.985
So if you think about stop signs, right? They're in red.

03:20.685 --> 03:23.905
Um, often marking of errors

03:24.245 --> 03:28.625
by professors like myself, are done in red, right?

03:28.765 --> 03:32.505
So, this, causes a certain pause,

03:33.205 --> 03:34.825
and maybe avoidance.

03:35.445 --> 03:39.745
And if you are facing a team in red, this,

03:40.455 --> 03:43.865
initial, inclination may,

03:44.245 --> 03:45.465
be your undoing.

03:46.165 --> 03:50.305
So, so one again, one mechanism would be

03:50.305 --> 03:52.945
through associations, through conditioning of past.

03:53.885 --> 03:58.505
The other avenue is the evolutionary one that

03:58.505 --> 04:01.945
through evolution, certain, colors

04:02.775 --> 04:04.665
were associated with dominance,

04:05.245 --> 04:08.185
and that is also manifested down the road,

04:08.185 --> 04:09.625
maybe, possibly again in sports.

04:10.165 --> 04:14.645
Um, so there is research in certain birds to show

04:14.645 --> 04:17.765
that red, when there are different coloring offering,

04:18.025 --> 04:21.245
red seems to be more dominant than other, than other colors.

04:21.745 --> 04:23.685
Uh, there's actually experiments that show

04:23.685 --> 04:27.125
that if you inject with artificial color,

04:29.035 --> 04:33.935
red seems to, in, in, in, in matchups

04:33.935 --> 04:38.215
between, this type of bird, the,

04:38.315 --> 04:41.175
the red seems to be dominant over other colors.

04:41.795 --> 04:45.175
So, it's both observational and experimental.

04:45.675 --> 04:50.625
And those are the two proposed mechanisms that, again,

04:50.845 --> 04:54.305
the one of association, learned association

04:54.485 --> 04:57.745
and the one that is biologically rooted through evolution.

04:58.605 --> 05:02.205
Um, other tenets of the,

05:02.765 --> 05:06.445
coloring context, theory is the context.

05:07.145 --> 05:08.885
So context matters.

05:10.115 --> 05:13.055
So for example, and I think that's the, the, the,

05:13.435 --> 05:16.975
the best illustration, possibly

05:17.525 --> 05:19.175
when it's a romantic session.

05:19.915 --> 05:22.255
Uh, red, red signifies

05:23.255 --> 05:25.395
approach orientation, right?

05:25.495 --> 05:28.915
So, red, you know, red lipstick,

05:29.175 --> 05:31.355
red light district, and so on, right?

05:31.355 --> 05:32.435
So this association,

05:32.465 --> 05:35.755
however, in sports, possibly,

05:36.215 --> 05:40.435
it might give the opposite, right, as we discussed before,

05:40.615 --> 05:45.515
or one the one off, avoidance,

05:45.665 --> 05:49.195
this inclination to come into contact, which again,

05:49.245 --> 05:53.235
would be, a disadvantage, especially in sport.

05:53.975 --> 05:57.075
So, those are some of the, those are not all,

05:57.225 --> 06:00.365
but those are some of the, important assumptions

06:00.955 --> 06:03.085
that, this theory makes.

06:03.865 --> 06:07.645
And now possibly we can kind of apply them to sports.

06:08.505 --> 06:13.345
Um, and, I can talk about,

06:13.355 --> 06:18.265
three, major lines of research within sport

06:18.415 --> 06:21.265
with specific colors that,

06:22.565 --> 06:26.785
fit the theory to more than one specifically in sport.

06:27.165 --> 06:28.385
Uh, as I mentioned before,

06:28.485 --> 06:30.745
we have the red superiority effect.

06:31.535 --> 06:35.835
Um, we have, also the association

06:35.835 --> 06:36.835
between black

06:37.215 --> 06:41.515
and, enhanced, elevated aggression.

06:42.295 --> 06:47.075
And we have, wearing white as,

06:47.515 --> 06:52.355
disadvantage, distinctly in judo.

06:52.615 --> 06:54.115
But let's, let's talk. So, okay.

06:54.115 --> 06:55.915
So those are the three lines. Let's talk about,

06:56.085 --> 06:57.435
let's elaborate on each one,

06:57.735 --> 07:00.475
and I'll try to, plug in some research

07:00.575 --> 07:02.355
to make it more concrete.

07:02.975 --> 07:06.665
So the red superiority effect,

07:07.445 --> 07:12.225
pretty much was promoted by a study, that some,

07:12.685 --> 07:16.395
some traction in nature by hill

07:16.395 --> 07:18.115
and Barton from 2005.

07:18.935 --> 07:22.475
And they show that in the Athens Olympics,

07:24.085 --> 07:28.305
of 2004, in four types

07:28.305 --> 07:32.585
of combat sports, TaeKwonDo, boxing, wrestling,

07:32.605 --> 07:37.245
two types of wrestling, those competitors that were assigned

07:37.585 --> 07:41.045
to wear red as opposed to one, the ones

07:41.045 --> 07:44.235
that were wearing blue,

07:44.415 --> 07:49.075
won significantly more than what you'd expect if it was,

07:49.235 --> 07:50.795
a random assignment, 50%.

07:51.655 --> 07:56.075
Um, they argued that it was a natural experiment.

07:56.335 --> 07:58.235
So basically there is random assignment,

07:58.335 --> 08:00.915
but it's not for the purpose of running an experiment.

08:01.015 --> 08:03.035
It just happens, in real life.

08:03.415 --> 08:06.635
Uh, and thus, if we have random assignment, again,

08:06.775 --> 08:10.875
one would expect 50% winning for both, for each color,

08:11.295 --> 08:14.155
but the red ones prevailed significantly more.

08:14.615 --> 08:17.795
And they made this argument for the red superiority effect,

08:18.415 --> 08:23.275
again, supported possibly by either evolution,

08:23.495 --> 08:27.875
or biological, explanations or through association.

08:28.305 --> 08:32.155
Association. Um, so that was, exhibit number one.

08:32.655 --> 08:36.835
Uh, then, this, the red superiority effect

08:37.695 --> 08:42.195
was extended by atrial, et al

08:43.835 --> 08:46.335
two, British soccer actually.

08:47.035 --> 08:51.975
So, they, conducted an archival research,

08:52.495 --> 08:54.215
starting from 1947,

08:55.265 --> 08:58.605
Uh, all the way to,

08:59.505 --> 09:03.845
2000 and some, I'm not sure, 2008, possibly.

09:04.465 --> 09:08.925
So, more than 50 years of, of soccer,

09:09.585 --> 09:13.685
showing the, again, the red superiority effect.

09:13.745 --> 09:17.485
So teams that were in red were significantly more likely

09:17.585 --> 09:18.605
to win championships.

09:19.155 --> 09:23.525
They performed better than expected in their home games

09:24.015 --> 09:27.245
where they were wearing their red uniforms,

09:27.465 --> 09:32.085
but they were not outperforming when they were playing in an

09:32.155 --> 09:36.165
away games where they weren't, donning their red,

09:36.545 --> 09:38.245
color uniforms.

09:38.745 --> 09:42.765
Um, they showed that in derby matches.

09:43.185 --> 09:44.565
So derby matches are good

09:44.565 --> 09:48.325
because basically the two teams are in terms of,

09:48.725 --> 09:52.285
resources are probably similar, so

09:52.905 --> 09:54.205
the two Manchester teams

09:54.625 --> 09:57.765
and other places in, in, in Great Britain.

09:58.265 --> 10:02.005
Uh, so you keep the, the resources rather similar.

10:02.225 --> 10:03.965
And you look at uniform colors,

10:04.305 --> 10:08.725
and they show that, red teams on average,

10:09.315 --> 10:14.125
performed, better, in the League League ranking

10:14.635 --> 10:16.045
than the non red teams.

10:16.905 --> 10:20.205
So they showed quite extensively,

10:20.905 --> 10:24.285
the red superiority effect, again in British soccer,

10:24.385 --> 10:27.285
making several comparisons along the way.

10:28.025 --> 10:30.765
So that's the, red superiority effect.

10:30.765 --> 10:32.565
There are other studies, in support

10:32.565 --> 10:33.765
as well, but those are the two major.

10:33.795 --> 10:37.365
Then I think it's worth, it's worth commenting

10:38.115 --> 10:40.485
that the first study, the hill

10:40.485 --> 10:44.445
and bottom one in the, combat sports is,

10:45.365 --> 10:49.165
I would say is a more, restricted one,

10:49.165 --> 10:52.165
because those are, indeed combat sports.

10:52.515 --> 10:55.565
They are, they, they are one-on-one type of competitions,

10:55.985 --> 10:58.165
and they tend to be shorter in duration.

10:59.025 --> 11:03.165
Uh, the soccer one, the soccer study is making a claim

11:03.165 --> 11:06.245
that is much more expensive, in the sense

11:06.245 --> 11:08.805
that it is a team, team, team sports.

11:09.035 --> 11:11.485
It's, ball oriented sports.

11:11.665 --> 11:14.445
So, talent,

11:14.925 --> 11:16.965
I would say is more important.

11:17.285 --> 11:20.405
Teamwork is more important than the, aggressive,

11:21.025 --> 11:22.165
part of sports.

11:22.825 --> 11:27.605
Um, so again, the claim here is, is broader

11:28.185 --> 11:29.845
for the red superiority effect.

11:30.265 --> 11:33.885
So that's, that's one, that's one, avenue of research.

11:34.665 --> 11:37.885
The second one is of black uniforms,

11:39.195 --> 11:40.965
elevating aggression.

11:41.505 --> 11:45.965
And here there is a, a very, influential study by,

11:46.025 --> 11:48.645
Frank and Gilovich from 88.

11:49.305 --> 11:52.045
Uh, and they looked at both the,

11:52.645 --> 11:54.325
NFL, the National Football League

11:54.345 --> 11:56.045
and the National Hockey League,

11:56.625 --> 12:00.565
and they showed, the teams that were wearing,

12:01.495 --> 12:05.805
black at home tended to be more aggressive.

12:06.345 --> 12:09.725
So they measured aggression differently for the NFL

12:09.725 --> 12:13.365
and the NHL, for the NFL, for the National Football League,

12:13.365 --> 12:16.005
they measured how many yards they were penalized.

12:16.025 --> 12:18.325
So when you commit an infraction, you are,

12:18.385 --> 12:19.565
you are, you are taken back.

12:19.665 --> 12:21.565
So they measured, that was their, their,

12:21.745 --> 12:23.085
outcome variable.

12:23.625 --> 12:27.445
And in the, national Hockey League, it was about the,

12:27.585 --> 12:30.245
so when you commit an infraction,

12:30.465 --> 12:31.765
you go to the penalty box.

12:31.795 --> 12:34.725
They imagine how many minutes teams spent in the,

12:34.725 --> 12:37.925
in the players of teams spent in the penalty box.

12:38.345 --> 12:40.805
Um, and again, they showed along those two measures

12:40.805 --> 12:45.445
that teams in black were more likely to be, penalized.

12:46.145 --> 12:48.925
Uh, and, but they weren't actually further, they,

12:48.995 --> 12:52.085
they suggested three ways in which there could be an

12:52.085 --> 12:55.405
association between black and aggression.

12:56.025 --> 13:00.615
The first one is indeed wearing black causes, one

13:00.615 --> 13:02.495
to be more aggressive, and they argued

13:02.495 --> 13:03.775
for a cultural association.

13:04.315 --> 13:07.455
Uh, so for example, in a Western,

13:08.155 --> 13:10.695
you can always know who is the good guy

13:10.695 --> 13:14.375
and who's the bad guy, bad guy was the, the, the black hat,

13:14.435 --> 13:15.775
the good guy, the white hat.

13:15.795 --> 13:17.935
So black again, is associated.

13:18.515 --> 13:22.495
Um, so, that was one link.

13:22.995 --> 13:25.175
The second link that is always important

13:25.175 --> 13:28.215
to consider in sports is that it's about perception.

13:28.595 --> 13:31.855
So maybe wearing black doesn't cause you

13:31.855 --> 13:35.775
to be more aggressive, but it causes the, it, the,

13:35.835 --> 13:39.975
in the eyes of the referees, you are more aggressive.

13:40.235 --> 13:43.455
So a similar act can be judged more harshly,

13:43.635 --> 13:44.935
and then you are penalized.

13:45.555 --> 13:48.855
Um, so, for example,

13:49.045 --> 13:52.815
what they did brilliantly, I would say they, they

13:53.495 --> 13:55.575
orchestrated two plays.

13:56.235 --> 13:59.855
Um, so they had a, they had two, two football teams,

13:59.995 --> 14:01.135
two football squads.

14:01.635 --> 14:03.375
Uh, they ran the same play.

14:04.035 --> 14:06.975
Um, and in one, the team was in black,

14:07.355 --> 14:08.535
and the defensive team

14:08.635 --> 14:12.095
and the, in the other, the white team was wa the,

14:12.115 --> 14:13.415
the defensive team was white,

14:13.435 --> 14:16.855
but again, made to look exactly similar.

14:17.235 --> 14:21.255
And then they had, it was videotaped and referees

14:21.315 --> 14:22.695
and lay people watched it

14:22.715 --> 14:25.095
and assessed the likelihood of the,

14:25.435 --> 14:27.495
of the tackle That ended the play

14:27.875 --> 14:29.455
as an infringement, as a foul.

14:29.995 --> 14:33.025
Uh, and, it was shown

14:33.025 --> 14:35.425
that when the defensive team was in black,

14:35.605 --> 14:37.105
it was increased.

14:37.495 --> 14:39.145
They saw it as more as,

14:39.245 --> 14:42.385
as more an aggressive play than in white.

14:42.965 --> 14:46.185
So they said perception might be at play here.

14:46.805 --> 14:50.655
Um, in terms of the

14:50.685 --> 14:53.765
Real increase, they did another experiment.

14:54.265 --> 14:58.765
Um, but, it did not really involve,

14:59.245 --> 15:02.565
physical act, but, planning to, to do things.

15:02.585 --> 15:05.565
And it seems that when, when people,

15:05.675 --> 15:08.325
when participants were wearing black, they

15:08.875 --> 15:12.685
decided they wanted to compete against others in games

15:12.715 --> 15:16.805
that were decided ap priori as more violent,

15:16.935 --> 15:18.885
aggressive in nature as opposed

15:18.905 --> 15:20.285
to when they were wearing white.

15:20.665 --> 15:22.325
So this is more intention

15:22.385 --> 15:24.645
to act rather than actually, doing it.

15:24.645 --> 15:28.845
But they said those two, the, the perception

15:29.225 --> 15:31.765
and the actual increase are the likely

15:32.405 --> 15:33.845
culprits in this association.

15:34.425 --> 15:38.085
Um, there's always this, notion that it could be

15:38.085 --> 15:39.445
through a third variable.

15:39.945 --> 15:43.685
Uh, so for example, ownership, maybe they seek players

15:44.195 --> 15:46.125
that are especially aggressive.

15:46.155 --> 15:47.725
They think that that's gonna give them

15:47.725 --> 15:48.925
an edge on, on the field.

15:49.505 --> 15:52.485
And they also know that black is intimidating,

15:52.905 --> 15:56.045
and thus those two are not necessarily related,

15:56.345 --> 15:59.005
but they're going, the, the, so the, the linkage is

15:59.005 --> 16:00.245
through a third variable.

16:00.465 --> 16:02.085
That's another, that's another option.

16:02.905 --> 16:06.925
Um, the, the last, line of research

16:07.825 --> 16:11.685
is of white, according actually disadvantage.

16:12.305 --> 16:16.165
Uh, but this is, aside from the,

16:16.175 --> 16:19.885
color in context theory, the argument here is

16:19.885 --> 16:24.605
that if you are in white, you can be, it's a,

16:24.605 --> 16:27.165
it's a visibility contrast argument

16:27.515 --> 16:29.605
that you can be spotted earlier.

16:30.465 --> 16:33.885
Uh, and in judo, for example, if you,

16:34.185 --> 16:38.605
you can spot your, opponent's moves, early,

16:39.385 --> 16:41.565
it helps you in preparation.

16:42.025 --> 16:45.205
It, it basically gives you a significant advantage.

16:45.825 --> 16:48.445
Uh, I should say that this, this line

16:48.445 --> 16:50.845
of research has been, in my eyes,

16:51.245 --> 16:55.685
thoroughly debunked the research, that, shows

16:55.715 --> 17:00.565
otherwise is stronger, than the one,

17:00.625 --> 17:03.165
in support of this, of this effect.

17:03.705 --> 17:07.485
So, largely it's about red,

17:07.945 --> 17:09.405
the red superiority effect.

17:09.465 --> 17:12.685
So that accords, eventual,

17:12.835 --> 17:16.405
greater likelihood in eventually triumphing over your

17:16.645 --> 17:21.005
opponent and the black association with elevated aggression.

17:21.005 --> 17:25.605
Those are the two, main research lines in sports,

17:26.305 --> 17:28.605
of colors of color influence.

17:28.705 --> 17:31.205
So it seems like, strong

17:31.305 --> 17:34.325
and robust research showing the effects.

17:34.425 --> 17:37.445
But, upon most scrutiny,

17:38.485 --> 17:39.925
I actually think otherwise.

17:39.985 --> 17:41.845
And actually, we conducted research.

17:42.185 --> 17:43.405
So aside from the review,

17:43.465 --> 17:45.645
we actually conducted our own research

17:46.065 --> 17:48.925
and attempted to replicate some of those findings.

17:49.625 --> 17:51.645
And largely we failed to do so.

17:51.705 --> 17:54.245
So, I'll, I'll outline now our efforts

17:54.745 --> 17:57.205
and maybe, then conclude more broadly.

17:57.865 --> 18:01.565
So, with the red superiority effect, we attempted to,

18:02.345 --> 18:05.845
replicate the findings of, in,

18:06.065 --> 18:07.605
in British soccer.

18:08.705 --> 18:13.515
And, we argued, listen, the years

18:13.705 --> 18:15.715
that they have, included.

18:15.895 --> 18:20.115
So from 1947 to 2008 is indeed very impressive,

18:20.115 --> 18:22.675
and we always strive for a large sample size.

18:23.425 --> 18:27.235
However, this is not the case here

18:27.235 --> 18:30.875
because if you think about Great Britain in 1947,

18:31.735 --> 18:34.955
and, as the state of soccer, just coming out

18:34.955 --> 18:38.275
of World War ii, utterly devastated,

18:39.135 --> 18:42.155
the soccer being very, amateur, of course.

18:42.295 --> 18:47.115
And, and then you, you lump it together with the EPL,

18:47.575 --> 18:52.235
when it's the most, profitable, most,

18:52.415 --> 18:56.395
international probably league, that, that's,

18:56.395 --> 18:57.515
that's apples and oranges.

18:57.515 --> 18:59.275
That's, that's not a good comparison.

18:59.335 --> 19:00.595
That's things have changed.

19:01.455 --> 19:05.635
Um, that's not what, we should, do.

19:05.975 --> 19:10.515
So we conducted a more limited,

19:11.215 --> 19:12.795
we, we engaged a, a,

19:12.915 --> 19:16.915
a more limited sample size from 92 when the EPL was,

19:16.915 --> 19:18.635
founded until 2018.

19:19.335 --> 19:22.875
Um, and we repeated the, the analysis

19:22.935 --> 19:27.595
and basically, we, our, our, we contend

19:28.265 --> 19:30.795
that this is not red uniform effect.

19:30.795 --> 19:32.795
This is haphazardly,

19:32.795 --> 19:35.235
mostly three teams in England, right?

19:35.425 --> 19:40.035
Liverpool Master United in Arsenal, who,

19:40.215 --> 19:41.595
those teams were red

19:42.095 --> 19:44.075
and traditionally were very successful.

19:44.575 --> 19:47.035
Uh, but it's not because they were red,

19:47.035 --> 19:50.195
because there are other, there are other, factors here.

19:50.735 --> 19:54.235
Um, and the, even though that the, the,

19:54.235 --> 19:57.395
sample size seems impressive, generally,

19:57.395 --> 20:01.555
they included about 68 teams, all in all.

20:02.015 --> 20:05.635
So, the, the presence of those three teams was

20:06.265 --> 20:09.555
greatly influential and in essence, biased.

20:09.735 --> 20:14.435
The, the sample, in our, in our exploration,

20:14.615 --> 20:18.155
we did not find that the red teams performed,

20:18.155 --> 20:20.235
significantly better at home than others.

20:20.815 --> 20:24.875
Um, we extended, since we had the smaller sample size,

20:25.495 --> 20:27.875
we extended the inquiry to

20:28.415 --> 20:31.395
six other leagues competitive leagues in Europe,

20:31.515 --> 20:32.715
Portugal, Germany,

20:33.135 --> 20:36.195
or Italy, all the other best, the, the best leagues.

20:36.195 --> 20:39.355
And there's no red superiority effect in those leagues.

20:39.815 --> 20:44.475
Um, so, you know, if you have a small sample size

20:44.495 --> 20:46.475
and you have, three dominant teams,

20:47.105 --> 20:50.285
Um, it's gonna, it's gonna, it's gonna skew the results.

20:50.945 --> 20:55.525
So, we did not find support for, for, in our, in our,

20:55.825 --> 20:58.285
effort that obviously

20:58.885 --> 21:01.045
I would contend is, is the better one.

21:01.345 --> 21:02.485
Uh, others may argue.

21:03.105 --> 21:07.085
Uh, but we failed to, to find this, association.

21:07.665 --> 21:11.045
And in relationship to the black,

21:11.965 --> 21:13.245
elevated aggression Association.

21:13.305 --> 21:16.925
We also conducted, our own replication.

21:17.345 --> 21:21.125
So the original is from 1970 to 1986.

21:21.785 --> 21:25.885
Uh, and we looked at, data from,

21:26.945 --> 21:31.205
for a longer period of time, more modern up,

21:31.475 --> 21:34.685
from 99 to 2022.

21:35.425 --> 21:39.765
Um, and, we did not find the association,

21:39.775 --> 21:41.645
black teams were not.

21:41.745 --> 21:43.725
So, I, I wish I should say this.

21:44.055 --> 21:48.505
First of all, football is perceived,

21:48.865 --> 21:51.145
American football is perceived as a very violent

21:51.285 --> 21:54.825
and aggressive game, but we found that most

21:54.845 --> 21:58.105
of the infractions are actually not aggressive based.

21:58.765 --> 22:02.905
Um, so, when you look at, at infringement,

22:03.215 --> 22:05.665
they could be aggressive in nature.

22:05.965 --> 22:09.345
So roughing the pass, the passer, roughing the kicker,

22:09.495 --> 22:10.705
unnecessary roughness,

22:11.205 --> 22:15.465
but they could be also questions of, coordination.

22:15.485 --> 22:18.625
So for start, they start playing before they should.

22:19.365 --> 22:23.305
And significantly more infringements

22:23.885 --> 22:26.825
in football are non-aggressive ones.

22:26.895 --> 22:30.265
Only less than 15% are what you could argue

22:30.685 --> 22:31.705
as aggressive base.

22:32.125 --> 22:33.505
So what they did

22:33.505 --> 22:35.745
before when they looked at yards penalized

22:36.325 --> 22:37.825
was not a good measure.

22:38.885 --> 22:42.665
And when you separate the infringements

22:42.665 --> 22:45.505
that are aggressive based versus non-aggressive based,

22:45.565 --> 22:50.485
and look only at the aggressive base, there is no effect,

22:50.625 --> 22:53.845
no, no association with teams that were black.

22:54.305 --> 22:59.085
Um, we had a more, detailed,

22:59.425 --> 23:02.005
we could look at each team separately,

23:02.005 --> 23:03.845
because in the modern era,

23:04.375 --> 23:06.965
teams wear different type, different colors.

23:07.075 --> 23:09.245
They have all sets of uniforms.

23:09.625 --> 23:13.165
Um, they don't do exclusively home in a way.

23:13.505 --> 23:16.685
So we could look at the same team,

23:16.765 --> 23:20.605
wearing black versus non-black and making,

23:20.905 --> 23:24.565
and within comparison, and again, for several teams,

23:24.625 --> 23:26.005
and we did not find the effect.

23:26.985 --> 23:31.845
So, also on this count, I don't think

23:31.845 --> 23:34.645
that the effect exists based on our research.

23:35.785 --> 23:38.365
Um, I would

23:39.535 --> 23:44.185
most generally say, so, you know, in our, in our,

23:44.485 --> 23:48.405
in our review, I'm going back to our review, I should say

23:48.405 --> 23:51.285
that the research is, it, its nascent phase.

23:51.625 --> 23:55.325
We, we had 33 articles. That's not a large number.

23:55.985 --> 24:00.085
Uh, but pretty much for each study that found an effect,

24:00.385 --> 24:04.125
we could find one that would debunk the effect.

24:04.505 --> 24:08.845
So that's not, that's not a strong,

24:10.055 --> 24:12.325
stand or voice in favor of effects.

24:12.585 --> 24:15.205
You should, you should find significantly more if you,

24:15.665 --> 24:17.165
if you think that the effect is there,

24:17.225 --> 24:20.685
you should find significantly more studies in support in

24:20.685 --> 24:21.885
comparison to those who debunk,

24:22.005 --> 24:23.485
which debunk, and that's not the case.

24:24.145 --> 24:28.025
Um, I think, it's, if,

24:28.245 --> 24:31.615
if I consider more broadly,

24:32.435 --> 24:37.295
if the effect is there, it's most likely in perception

24:37.835 --> 24:42.135
rather than in true influence over,

24:44.055 --> 24:45.255
behavior or performance.

24:45.855 --> 24:47.895
'cause this requires significantly more.

24:48.595 --> 24:52.695
Um, it again requires the, the, the, the, the athletes

24:53.035 --> 24:54.415
to act differently.

24:54.525 --> 24:56.375
It's not perce perception is one.

24:56.715 --> 25:01.655
And then in turn, it also necessitates a change in behavior.

25:02.465 --> 25:06.935
While if we take the, the referees r route,

25:07.515 --> 25:09.455
it's merely perception, right?

25:09.475 --> 25:11.015
So the same, the same behavior

25:11.555 --> 25:13.895
can be judged differently based on the color.

25:14.075 --> 25:16.015
And that's, that's a kind of a lower threshold.

25:16.235 --> 25:19.015
And I think that if we ought to find an effect,

25:19.045 --> 25:22.815
it's actually through this mechanism rather than the

25:22.955 --> 25:24.295
actual change in behavior.

25:24.715 --> 25:27.975
And there is an, an interesting study here, conducted

25:27.975 --> 25:30.295
by a German group that I think is telling

25:30.435 --> 25:33.975
and, important where what they did is they, they

25:34.615 --> 25:37.575
recorded the TaeKwonDo, competition

25:38.355 --> 25:40.615
and, they flipped the color.

25:40.795 --> 25:43.815
So in one for one set of participants, so it's a,

25:43.815 --> 25:46.935
was a counterbalanced experiment for one set

25:46.935 --> 25:51.055
of participants they watch, competitor A in red

25:51.195 --> 25:53.175
and competitor B in blue.

25:53.635 --> 25:55.495
And for the other set of participants,

25:55.775 --> 25:57.375
randomly aside, it was the opposite.

25:58.195 --> 26:02.415
And across the two conditions, the red competitor,

26:02.555 --> 26:05.895
the one in red, was awarded more points,

26:06.035 --> 26:07.615
for their, performance.

26:07.955 --> 26:12.295
So that, that gives some sense that possibly,

26:12.585 --> 26:16.215
perception, referee, ref,

26:16.655 --> 26:17.975
specifically referee perception.

26:18.395 --> 26:23.015
We could see some influence of color, over performance,

26:23.185 --> 26:25.735
again, through judgment rather than

26:26.245 --> 26:28.495
real changes in behavior we need to do better.

26:28.955 --> 26:33.615
Um, as said previously with sample sizes,

26:34.195 --> 26:35.695
we need to,

26:35.845 --> 26:38.815
conduct longitudinal research in that regard.

26:39.535 --> 26:42.815
I think, experimental research that,

26:43.095 --> 26:47.935
Looks at, behavior,

26:48.515 --> 26:50.295
is strongly needed.

26:51.115 --> 26:55.445
Um, so we, we need to do better in terms

26:55.465 --> 26:59.085
of research methods, and we also need to do,

26:59.665 --> 27:03.845
better in terms of understanding the rules of competition

27:05.045 --> 27:07.745
and making sure that we get it right.

27:08.325 --> 27:12.105
Uh, so, you know, if it's a,

27:12.105 --> 27:13.465
if it's a natural experiment,

27:13.465 --> 27:15.065
indeed it is a natural experiment

27:15.065 --> 27:17.225
and there is no alternative explanations

27:17.225 --> 27:18.265
and it's not color

27:18.265 --> 27:20.425
that is actually driving the effect, but something else.

27:21.685 --> 27:23.785
So we need real expertise.

27:23.785 --> 27:26.745
And again, I would, I would, I would,

27:28.135 --> 27:32.995
my opinion is that the perception, looking at referees,

27:33.495 --> 27:36.355
utilizing referees

27:36.655 --> 27:39.515
as participants rather than lay participants,

27:39.615 --> 27:42.995
and seeing whether the effects are there,

27:43.305 --> 27:47.075
more wholesomely would be, would be, the way to go.

00:00 - It's really important that the two teams are distinguishable, that, they know, folk from friend, that the, that the fans know, to distinguish the two that the referee obviously can distinguish. So it's clearly apparent, right?

00:22 - And it's, it's made as such. And, indeed it is. So it, stands to reason that we would also look for associations that, this so apparent, coloring schemes may influence performance. but, my research is informing, informing me actually otherwise. But we can start from the, assumption that there is an effect and then work our way to, possibly, whether is not one,

01:02 - and I think it would be worthwhile grounding the discussion in the theory of, Elliot and Mayor from 2014 of, coloring context. So it's, it's a broader theory. It's not, it's, it does not only pertain to sport, but it's a, it's a good starting point. And, it argues several things, for example, that, colors have, psychological meaning beyond, physiological properties.

01:35 - so they carry relevant, meanings to human beings and otherwise as well. that, they elicit, a response that at the core is either approach or avoidance oriented. and this is really, really important in sports where, if you gain, minimal advantage initially, it may make big, difference in the outcome, of the competition. it argues, for example, that those, the,

02:19 - the way that certain colors gain meaning is through two, two distinct mechanisms. One is of conditioning. So repeated associations of past, give meaning to future, encounters. So I, an example for that would be, so red is, is discussed often in sports, for example, or, or otherwise attraction. so,

02:55 - and in research in sport, we some argue for the, red, superiority effect. The teams in red, tend to win more than others. possibly this has been gained through the association in red of red and apprehension or, being stalled. So if you think about stop signs, right? They're in red. often marking of errors by professors like myself, are done in red, right? So, this, causes a certain pause,

03:33 - and maybe avoidance. And if you are facing a team in red, this, initial, inclination may, be your undoing. So, so one again, one mechanism would be through associations, through conditioning of past. The other avenue is the evolutionary one that through evolution, certain, colors were associated with dominance, and that is also manifested down the road,

04:08 - maybe, possibly again in sports. so there is research in certain birds to show that red, when there are different coloring offering, red seems to be more dominant than other, than other colors. there's actually experiments that show that if you inject with artificial color, red seems to, in, in, in, in matchups between, this type of bird, the, the red seems to be dominant over other colors. So, it's both observational and experimental.

04:45 - And those are the two proposed mechanisms that, again, the one of association, learned association and the one that is biologically rooted through evolution. other tenets of the, coloring context, theory is the context. So context matters. So for example, and I think that's the, the, the, the best illustration, possibly when it's a romantic session. red, red signifies

05:23 - approach orientation, right? So, red, you know, red lipstick, red light district, and so on, right? So this association, however, in sports, possibly, it might give the opposite, right, as we discussed before, or one the one off, avoidance, this inclination to come into contact, which again, would be, a disadvantage, especially in sport. So, those are some of the, those are not all,

05:57 - but those are some of the, important assumptions that, this theory makes. And now possibly we can kind of apply them to sports. and, I can talk about, three, major lines of research within sport with specific colors that, fit the theory to more than one specifically in sport. as I mentioned before, we have the red superiority effect. we have, also the association

06:35 - between black and, enhanced, elevated aggression. And we have, wearing white as, disadvantage, distinctly in judo. But let's, let's talk. So, okay. So those are the three lines. Let's talk about, let's elaborate on each one, and I'll try to, plug in some research to make it more concrete. So the red superiority effect,

07:07 - pretty much was promoted by a study, that some, some traction in nature by hill and Barton from 2005. And they show that in the Athens Olympics, of 2004, in four types of combat sports, TaeKwonDo, boxing, wrestling, two types of wrestling, those competitors that were assigned to wear red as opposed to one, the ones that were wearing blue, won significantly more than what you'd expect if it was,

07:49 - a random assignment, 50%. they argued that it was a natural experiment. So basically there is random assignment, but it's not for the purpose of running an experiment. It just happens, in real life. and thus, if we have random assignment, again, one would expect 50% winning for both, for each color, but the red ones prevailed significantly more. And they made this argument for the red superiority effect, again, supported possibly by either evolution,

08:23 - or biological, explanations or through association. Association. so that was, exhibit number one. then, this, the red superiority effect was extended by atrial, et al two, British soccer actually. So, they, conducted an archival research, starting from 1947, all the way to, 2000 and some, I'm not sure, 2008, possibly. So, more than 50 years of, of soccer,

09:09 - showing the, again, the red superiority effect. So teams that were in red were significantly more likely to win championships. They performed better than expected in their home games where they were wearing their red uniforms, but they were not outperforming when they were playing in an away games where they weren't, donning their red, color uniforms. they showed that in derby matches. So derby matches are good

09:44 - because basically the two teams are in terms of, resources are probably similar, so the two Manchester teams and other places in, in, in Great Britain. so you keep the, the resources rather similar. And you look at uniform colors, and they show that, red teams on average, performed, better, in the League League ranking than the non red teams. So they showed quite extensively,

10:20 - the red superiority effect, again in British soccer, making several comparisons along the way. So that's the, red superiority effect. There are other studies, in support as well, but those are the two major. Then I think it's worth, it's worth commenting that the first study, the hill and bottom one in the, combat sports is, I would say is a more, restricted one, because those are, indeed combat sports.

10:52 - They are, they, they are one-on-one type of competitions, and they tend to be shorter in duration. the soccer one, the soccer study is making a claim that is much more expensive, in the sense that it is a team, team, team sports. It's, ball oriented sports. So, talent, I would say is more important. Teamwork is more important than the, aggressive, part of sports.

11:22 - so again, the claim here is, is broader for the red superiority effect. So that's, that's one, that's one, avenue of research. The second one is of black uniforms, elevating aggression. And here there is a, a very, influential study by, Frank and Gilovich from 88. and they looked at both the, NFL, the National Football League and the National Hockey League,

11:56 - and they showed, the teams that were wearing, black at home tended to be more aggressive. So they measured aggression differently for the NFL and the NHL, for the NFL, for the National Football League, they measured how many yards they were penalized. So when you commit an infraction, you are, you are, you are taken back. So they measured, that was their, their, outcome variable. And in the, national Hockey League, it was about the,

12:27 - so when you commit an infraction, you go to the penalty box. They imagine how many minutes teams spent in the, in the players of teams spent in the penalty box. and again, they showed along those two measures that teams in black were more likely to be, penalized. and, but they weren't actually further, they, they suggested three ways in which there could be an association between black and aggression. The first one is indeed wearing black causes, one

13:00 - to be more aggressive, and they argued for a cultural association. so for example, in a Western, you can always know who is the good guy and who's the bad guy, bad guy was the, the, the black hat, the good guy, the white hat. So black again, is associated. so, that was one link. The second link that is always important to consider in sports is that it's about perception.

13:28 - So maybe wearing black doesn't cause you to be more aggressive, but it causes the, it, the, in the eyes of the referees, you are more aggressive. So a similar act can be judged more harshly, and then you are penalized. so, for example, what they did brilliantly, I would say they, they orchestrated two plays. so they had a, they had two, two football teams, two football squads.

14:01 - they ran the same play. and in one, the team was in black, and the defensive team and the, in the other, the white team was wa the, the defensive team was white, but again, made to look exactly similar. And then they had, it was videotaped and referees and lay people watched it and assessed the likelihood of the, of the tackle That ended the play

14:27 - as an infringement, as a foul. and, it was shown that when the defensive team was in black, it was increased. They saw it as more as, as more an aggressive play than in white. So they said perception might be at play here. in terms of the Real increase, they did another experiment. but, it did not really involve,

14:59 - physical act, but, planning to, to do things. And it seems that when, when people, when participants were wearing black, they decided they wanted to compete against others in games that were decided ap priori as more violent, aggressive in nature as opposed to when they were wearing white. So this is more intention to act rather than actually, doing it. But they said those two, the, the perception

15:29 - and the actual increase are the likely culprits in this association. there's always this, notion that it could be through a third variable. so for example, ownership, maybe they seek players that are especially aggressive. They think that that's gonna give them an edge on, on the field. And they also know that black is intimidating, and thus those two are not necessarily related,

15:56 - but they're going, the, the, so the, the linkage is through a third variable. That's another, that's another option. the, the last, line of research is of white, according actually disadvantage. but this is, aside from the, color in context theory, the argument here is that if you are in white, you can be, it's a, it's a visibility contrast argument that you can be spotted earlier.

16:30 - and in judo, for example, if you, you can spot your, opponent's moves, early, it helps you in preparation. It, it basically gives you a significant advantage. I should say that this, this line of research has been, in my eyes, thoroughly debunked the research, that, shows otherwise is stronger, than the one, in support of this, of this effect. So, largely it's about red,

17:07 - the red superiority effect. So that accords, eventual, greater likelihood in eventually triumphing over your opponent and the black association with elevated aggression. Those are the two, main research lines in sports, of colors of color influence. So it seems like, strong and robust research showing the effects. But, upon most scrutiny, I actually think otherwise.

17:39 - And actually, we conducted research. So aside from the review, we actually conducted our own research and attempted to replicate some of those findings. And largely we failed to do so. So, I'll, I'll outline now our efforts and maybe, then conclude more broadly. So, with the red superiority effect, we attempted to, replicate the findings of, in, in British soccer.

18:08 - And, we argued, listen, the years that they have, included. So from 1947 to 2008 is indeed very impressive, and we always strive for a large sample size. However, this is not the case here because if you think about Great Britain in 1947, and, as the state of soccer, just coming out of World War ii, utterly devastated, the soccer being very, amateur, of course. And, and then you, you lump it together with the EPL,

18:47 - when it's the most, profitable, most, international probably league, that, that's, that's apples and oranges. That's, that's not a good comparison. That's things have changed. that's not what, we should, do. So we conducted a more limited, we, we engaged a, a, a more limited sample size from 92 when the EPL was, founded until 2018.

19:19 - and we repeated the, the analysis and basically, we, our, our, we contend that this is not red uniform effect. This is haphazardly, mostly three teams in England, right? Liverpool Master United in Arsenal, who, those teams were red and traditionally were very successful. but it's not because they were red, because there are other, there are other, factors here.

19:50 - and the, even though that the, the, sample size seems impressive, generally, they included about 68 teams, all in all. So, the, the presence of those three teams was greatly influential and in essence, biased. The, the sample, in our, in our exploration, we did not find that the red teams performed, significantly better at home than others. we extended, since we had the smaller sample size, we extended the inquiry to

20:28 - six other leagues competitive leagues in Europe, Portugal, Germany, or Italy, all the other best, the, the best leagues. And there's no red superiority effect in those leagues. so, you know, if you have a small sample size and you have, three dominant teams, it's gonna, it's gonna, it's gonna skew the results. So, we did not find support for, for, in our, in our, effort that obviously I would contend is, is the better one.

21:01 - others may argue. but we failed to, to find this, association. And in relationship to the black, elevated aggression Association. We also conducted, our own replication. So the original is from 1970 to 1986. and we looked at, data from, for a longer period of time, more modern up, from 99 to 2022. and, we did not find the association,

21:39 - black teams were not. So, I, I wish I should say this. First of all, football is perceived, American football is perceived as a very violent and aggressive game, but we found that most of the infractions are actually not aggressive based. so, when you look at, at infringement, they could be aggressive in nature. So roughing the pass, the passer, roughing the kicker, unnecessary roughness,

22:11 - but they could be also questions of, coordination. So for start, they start playing before they should. And significantly more infringements in football are non-aggressive ones. Only less than 15% are what you could argue as aggressive base. So what they did before when they looked at yards penalized was not a good measure. And when you separate the infringements

22:42 - that are aggressive based versus non-aggressive based, and look only at the aggressive base, there is no effect, no, no association with teams that were black. we had a more, detailed, we could look at each team separately, because in the modern era, teams wear different type, different colors. They have all sets of uniforms. they don't do exclusively home in a way. So we could look at the same team,

23:16 - wearing black versus non-black and making, and within comparison, and again, for several teams, and we did not find the effect. So, also on this count, I don't think that the effect exists based on our research. I would most generally say, so, you know, in our, in our, in our review, I'm going back to our review, I should say that the research is, it, its nascent phase. We, we had 33 articles. That's not a large number.

23:55 - but pretty much for each study that found an effect, we could find one that would debunk the effect. So that's not, that's not a strong, stand or voice in favor of effects. You should, you should find significantly more if you, if you think that the effect is there, you should find significantly more studies in support in comparison to those who debunk, which debunk, and that's not the case. I think, it's, if,

24:28 - if I consider more broadly, if the effect is there, it's most likely in perception rather than in true influence over, behavior or performance. 'cause this requires significantly more. it again requires the, the, the, the, the athletes to act differently. It's not perce perception is one. And then in turn, it also necessitates a change in behavior. While if we take the, the referees r route,

25:07 - it's merely perception, right? So the same, the same behavior can be judged differently based on the color. And that's, that's a kind of a lower threshold. And I think that if we ought to find an effect, it's actually through this mechanism rather than the actual change in behavior. And there is an, an interesting study here, conducted by a German group that I think is telling and, important where what they did is they, they

25:34 - recorded the TaeKwonDo, competition and, they flipped the color. So in one for one set of participants, so it's a, was a counterbalanced experiment for one set of participants they watch, competitor A in red and competitor B in blue. And for the other set of participants, randomly aside, it was the opposite. And across the two conditions, the red competitor, the one in red, was awarded more points,

26:06 - for their, performance. So that, that gives some sense that possibly, perception, referee, ref, specifically referee perception. We could see some influence of color, over performance, again, through judgment rather than real changes in behavior we need to do better. as said previously with sample sizes, we need to, conduct longitudinal research in that regard.

26:39 - I think, experimental research that, Looks at, behavior, is strongly needed. so we, we need to do better in terms of research methods, and we also need to do, better in terms of understanding the rules of competition and making sure that we get it right. so, you know, if it's a, if it's a natural experiment, indeed it is a natural experiment

27:15 - and there is no alternative explanations and it's not color that is actually driving the effect, but something else. So we need real expertise. And again, I would, I would, I would, my opinion is that the perception, looking at referees, utilizing referees as participants rather than lay participants, and seeing whether the effects are there, more wholesomely would be, would be, the way to go.

Faculti AI can make mistakes